bobby the gook, week 17

screw me. one week left and i could have just slammed the door shut on fredo making this last week a formality, but instead, i have a piss poor week and leave a glimmer of hope for my mexican rival. anyways, i know that i've been apologizing a lot lately for not posting a whole lot. well that's all going to stop right now, cuz i've realized that i'm on vacation goddammit. i'll get back to the normal blogginh schedule when i damn well please. on that note, i'm not going to summarize any games, cuz i have to eat, clean up and head out for one last night on the town here in texas before i return on saturday, so if you can't wait until school starts up again for the greatness of my blogging well, then screw you. remember, it's the last week so it's hard to tell which starters are going to be rested for the playoffs and which teams wil play their regulars, which should explain many of the point spreads. last week, me 6-9-1, season 125-107-7 (.539); fredo 8-7-1, season 122-110-7 (.526). home team in bold.

SF (+13.5) over NE
PIT (+9) over BUF
BAL (-12) over MIA
MIN (-4) over WAS
CIN (-2.5) over PHI
GB (+3) over CHI
CAR (-8) over NO
DET (-3) over TEN
NYJ (-3.5) over STL
HOU (-10) over CLE
TB (+3) over ARI
SEA (-5) over ATL
IND (+9) over DEN
JAX (NL) over OAK (just picking straight up here)
SD (+3) over KC
DAL (+2.5) over NYG


bobby the gook, week 16

i know, i know, it's as if i've just given up on the blog. fear not kids, i'm just in texas for vacation, so i'm relegated to dial up in the kitchen since our other phone jacks don't seem to be working. anyways, i have much to blog about, but the usual holiday nonsense is taking up a lot of my time. in any case, there are some friday games i think, so i better post the results from the last couple of weeks as well as my picks for this week. we've had some less than great results this past week, but fredo has a really bad week in week 14 and i think this gives me a commanding lead at this point. here are the results from the last couple of weeks:

week 14
me 8-8
fredo 5-11

week 15
me 7-8-1
fredo 8-7-1

me 119-98-6 (.548)
fredo 114-103-6 (.525)
anyways, here are this weeks picks. home team in bold:

MIN (-3) over GB
man did the vikings get lucky last week. but i think that moss looks 100% again, and the vikes shake the jinx by effectively winning the division this week.

KC (-8) over OAK
where were you at the beginning of the season, oh might chiefs offense? the chiefs haven't been doing anything but covering recently. i think the offense keeps it going here.

TEN (+4) over DEN
home underdogs coming off a strong performance against overrated team, coach, and quarterback? billy volek for president! although i suspect that chris brown will have the big game here.

BAL (+5.5) over PIT
you know the spiel (sp?) by now, the steelers have got to lose again at some point, especially since the patriots lost last week. i also feel that the steelers have been more lucky than good lately, so i'm going to count on their luck running out.

DET (-6) over CHI
after i say that i'm not picking the lions ever again, they go and cover two weeks in a row. let's see how this works out this week.

CIN (-6) over NYG
i'm not sure if carson palmer is back or not, but i think i'm just rooting for eli to have one of the worst rookie seasons ever.

IND (-6.5) over SD
i hate picking against a team i like with a qb that i don't like personally, but as i've said many times before, no sense in getting off of this train. however, there is hope for chargers' fan as they've been playing the pass quite well in the second half of the season.

JAX (-7) over HOU
i just realized that i didn't put down a big bet last week. oh well, give me fifty bucks on the jags this week (7-7 on the big bet)

CAR (+2.5) over TAM
a most interesting game here. i picked up the panthers defense for the oter fantasy league that i'm in and i'm hoping that will translate into big points against a fairly mediocre bucs offense.

NO (-5) over ATL
huh? trap of some sort? i don't know. damn it, i wish i would have seen this line before i made my picks in the office pool (we only have to pick winners there, and oddly enough, i'm actually doing a lot better here in the point spread pickins). i have no idea what's going on with this line, so i'm ust going to assume it's a trap.

NE (-2.5) over NYJ
a couple of things that i need to say here. i seriously can't believe that the patriots lost last week. what's most surprising is the way they lost, just boneheaded play after boneheaded play. anyways, i'm sure that they'll bounce back. the other thing i need to say is that chad pennington is a sorry son of a bitch. i've been meaning to blog about this but i haven't been able to find all of the good quotes. anyways, in case you didn't see, he went on a little mini-tirade in a press conference about how the jets have been covered unfairly and how covering the jets is a privelege and not a right. hey pretty boy, go stuff the pontification up your ass. because of this, i've elevated him past peyton manning as my least favorite nfl player and i will root against the jets from here on out. normally i would say take the home dog here, but since i hate chad pennington, i'm going to say f him.

SF (+11) over BUF
i heard that mcgahee is out and without him, the bills are quite an ordinary team.

DAL (+2.5) over WAS
the cowboys are el stinko, but parcells has gibbs number. and lest we forget god, hates joe gibbs.

ARI (+7) over SEA
seattle is another team that has gotten extremely lucky over the past couple of weeks and i see complete let down here. i never thought that josh mccown was that bad and i bet with the ay the NFC west shaped up that dennis green had wished that he had not pulled the trigger on the qb change so early.

MIA (-8) over CLE
i don't even know who is starting at qb for the browns.

STL (-2.5) over PHI
andy reid does the smart thing and only plays mcnabb for a quarter, a half at the most. in other news, the general concensus is that the eagles are done without T.O. well, just count me in with the general concensus, iggles are done.

it's f-in cold here in texas. i can't wait to get back to so-cal.


dolphins, nick saban, and black coaches

every since ricky williams decided that he liked reefer better than football, we all knew that it was only a matter of time until dave wannstedt, one of the worst head coaches ever, would get the axe in miami. anyways, miami went about their search for his replacement, and anyone who knows anything could tell that nick saban, LSU's head coach was their guy. however, the dolphins couldn't hire him right away because NFL rules require teams looking for a new head coach to interview at least one minority candidate and that's what art shell did over the weekend.

this guy seems to think that even though the dolphins have no intention of hiring, that it was ok for shell to go ahead and go through with the dog and pony show and interview so that the dolphins can look like they're complying with the rules. like all minority hiring remedies, this is a tough one to figure out. is it good that NFL teams are required to interview a black candidate. of course it is, but is it good that teams can get around it by flying in any black coach and pretending to be interested in him. of course not. they could have flown in samuel l. jackson and it would've pretty much had the same effect. like i said, i'm still not sure what the answer is, but between this and ty willingham, it seems clear that black coaches do not get the same opportunities as white coaches. part of this is because of the general discourse of meritocracy of sports, that it's an insular thing that only represents the best in us, so if someone gets a job it's because he's earned it in some way. but since sports is not autonomous from the rest of society, this idea of meritocracy is at least partially a myth, as race dynamics continue to play themselves out in issues such as this.

the ragin' asian reviews the life aquatic with steve zizzou

one week late no less. what really sucks is that i actually saw it before most people in the country saw it. i was in LA last weekend and i hanging out with helene who happens to live next to one of only two theaters in the nation to be showing the life aquatic. but no, my procrastinating ways has prevented me from posting a review until now. it's weird, seeing as how i don't have any real deadlines to meet for school right now, you'd think i'd be blogging like crazy. but instead, i'm treating my blog like my newly completed thesis and just trying not to think about it. anyways, i head home tomorrow, but i'll try to be better about blogging then. anyways, on with the review.

i must confess that i love wes anderson's movies. i've recently decided that the royal tennenbaums is one of my top three movies, maybe even my favorite movie of all time. for his first three movies, anderson pretty much perfected the formula for goofy and quirky, yet somehow touching and sentimental at the same time. the life aquatic is much of the same. the general premise of the movie, a jacques cousteau type person in bill murray searching for the shark that killed his best friend, provides most of the goofy and quirky. the touching and sentimental is brought out through a subplot of luke wilson as the illegitimate child of bill murray and their attempt to forge a relationship. and it works just fine. the only problem is that it feels alot like a more elaborate version of the tennenbaums. on the one hand it's interesting to see what wes anderson can do with a huge budget, as a film like this one surely commanded. at the same time, it kinda feels like wes spent a little too much time on the more technical aspects of the movie instead of directing. as erik, who along with helene, i saw the movie with said that the movie never quite came together for him. and i'm inclined to agree with him to a point. there was a good thirty - forty minutes in the middle of the movie where i really hod no idea what was going on. but i think that it came together nicely at the end. anyways, my final verdict, good flick, better than rushmore, not as good as tennenbaums.


bobby the slacker gook, week 15

goddamit, i don't know what the hell i've been doing, but it sure as hell hasn't been paying attention to the blog. sorry kids, i'm tired and i've been playing lots of video games. anyways, i'll catch you up in the standings in a later post.

here are fredo's picks. they go first since he posted them first.

PIT over NYG - i have this in a parlay this weekend.
WAS over SF - this one, too.
CAR over ATL - ditto.
CHI over HOU - the bear's defense in the snow ought to cover.
BUF over CIN - i feel like this spread should be bigger, meaning look out for a trap, but i'm taking the bills anyway.
SD over CLE - another parlay pick.
MIN over DET - no idea.
NYJ over SEA - seattle will finish at .500.
PHI over DAL - stay away from it, though.
DEN over KC - i guess.
TAM over NO - blowout.
ARI over STL - like holmgren, martz is also trying to finish at .500.
JAX over GB - i should fear the frozen tundra, but that's just what they want me to do.
OAK over TEN - coin flip.
IND over BAL - also in a parlay. i think the colts will need at least 28 points to cover. why not?
NE over MIA - another why the f not?

i'm not sure if he took the spread into consideration, but i'll just assume he did unless he tells me different. here are my picks, home team in bold.

PIT (-10.5) over NYG
WAS (-6.5) over SF
CAR (+3) over ATL
NYJ (-6.5) over SEA
DAL (+12.5) over PHI
MIN (-3) over DET
CLE (+10) over SD
BUF (-2) over CIN
GB (-3.5) over JAX
CHI (-1) over HOU
TB (-8) over NO
STL (-3) over ARI
KC (-2) over DEN
OAK (-3) over TEN
IND (-8) over BAL
NE (-10) over MIA


better than lasik?

from boingboing. this freak me out.

rage against the flop

i'm back from a much needed mini-vacation in pasadena. i apologize to my faithful readers for the hiatus, but the pressures of providing quality content for the blog was just wearing me down. but seriously, the quarter is over and i'm done with school like things for a few weeks. anyways, on to my adventures this weekend.

saturday night, fredo and i went to the commerce casino in LA to play some poker. i actually did quite well and went home with an extra fifty dollars in my pocket. this is especially gratifying since at one point i was a hundred bucks down. but that pales in comparison to the other accomplishment that night, whipping zach de la rocha's ass.

this scrawny guy with a pretty nappy hairdo, half dreads-half afro, sits down at our table. i look at him and say, "has anyone ever told you that you look like zach de la rocha?" and he replies, "i get that all the time." after which he acts distinctly unfriendly. i guess that since we were playing poker that maybe he was not trying to give away his hands by remaining calm, but at it turns out, he was calm like a bomb, and played horribly. i probably took him for about twenty bucks. he was seeing everything, and paying to see the flop with some terrible hole cards. anyways, after about fifteen minutes, a guy comes up to our table, taps the scrawny guy's shoulder and says, "hey zack, there's a seat open at our table." my jaw drops as he gets up to leave. i just played poker with the former lead singer of rage against the machine.

anyways, it's real late and i'm getting tired, so i get up a few hands later, and make a beeline for zach. he's at a table near to the one fredo is playing at. i go up to him and the following exchange occurs.

me: hey man, i just wanted to say that i really dig your stuff.

zach: thanks man.

me: hey man, when is the new stuff going to come out? we've all been waiting for so long.

zach: it's coming, it's coming...

me: well good, cuz we really need it now. all right man, good luck tonight, and i'll be looking for the new stuff.

anyways, i really wish i would've realized that it was him when he was sitting at my table, because the ass-whipping would have been much greater. i would have asked even more assinine questions, like, "so who exactly are the people of the sun?" anyways, fredo and were talking about it, and we decided that this is one of the more egregious examples of an activist selling out. let's face it folks, playing poker is one of the more decidely pro-establishment things that you can be doing. i mean the gambling industry must deprive so many people of money that they could be using to feed their family, send their kids to better schools, and so on. and yet here is the lead singer of one of the most notable activist bands of all time playing along with the capitalist machine. what's even more f-ed up is that he was playing with us peons at the $2-$4 tables and not the higher stakes tables. i suppose that most of his money is caught up in "causes" or some dumb shit like that, but with the success of rage against the machine, fredo and i figured that this must be some way for him to connect with the people. anyways, i tried to get his picture with my cell phone camera, but he saw me and kept putting his hands up to his face so i couldn't get a good picture. what an a-hole. i should have said to myself, "fuck you i won't do what you tell me," but i decided that i had whipped his ass enough already, so i just gave up on it.

in any case, i now have twenty dollars of his money that would have no doubt gone to the table dancers that he and his flunkees were headed to see afterwards. in a sense, you could say that i was being the voice of the voiceless here. you could also say that whenever zach lost on the the river, that he was basically playing cards that were born of a broken hand. i could do this all night.

anyways, i also saw the life aquatic yesterday with helene and erik, so i'll post a review real soon.

*thanks to erik for helping me create the graphic


pop culture quick hits

done with the paper...just have to grade now, which is easy, since i just end up giving everyone a B+ except for the really hot chicks in class, who get A's. but seriously, hopefully i'll be able to get back to wasting your time and mine with more blogging.

1) campaigning for oscars becomes politcal. christian groups are urging very strongly that academy voters pick the passion of christ for best picture and what not. click here to see one person's really stupid website, that urges you to sign a petition that demands that mel gibson and his movie be recognized. here's a quote from the front page
It’s common practice for a movie company to re-release a major motion picture in the run up to the Oscars. These companies rarely make a significant amount of addition profit, but the re-release allows these companies to run promotional ads on television to build public support for their respective films, their director, actors, etc. In essence, these companies “campaign” for Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor Oscars, and more.

Well, Mel Gibson – class act that he is – has recently announced he will run no such ads to promote his powerful film The Passion of The Christ.

Therefore, it is up to us out here in the grassroots of mainstream America to take our message to Hollywood.
as you might guess, my response is what an a-hole. as if hollywood goes out of its way to offend christian sensibilities. anyways, i hope to god it doesn't get nominated so that i don't have to watch it in preparation for the oscars. also, michael moore is actively campaigning for fahrenheit 9/11. i've always thought that campaigning for your film was a little tacky, but not that michael moore is doing it, i think that it's a lot tacky.

2) jermaine dupri is organizing a follow up for we are the world. i'm all for it as long as li'l jon gets to say "yeahhhhhh, whhhhhaaattttttt, okaaaaayyyy" during the intro.

3) more god + entertainment news. i really don't know what to make of this.

4) i don't know what to make of this either. johnny depp is good, but i fear this may signal shark jumpage.


bobby the gook, week 14

jesus christ, i hate school sometimes. the quarter officially ends today and i still have to finish a paper and finish grading for the class i TA for. i've been so busy that i've more than neglected the blog. i should be commenting on things such as the dimebag darrell shooting, but i just haven't had the time (in case you were wondering, i just think that it's interesting that when violence breaks out at a rap concert, it's because the people were thugs, while when it happens at white people concerts, it's because the people were crazy, just something to think about). what makes it all the worse is that i totally kicked ass on my picks last week and i haven't had the chance to gloat. despite my stellar record that you will see below, i still managed to lose about forty bucks because the freakin' vikings lost to the bears and chutch. and that was the team on my three team parlay that i felt the best about. anyways, i've got another one going this weekend, so let's hope it all works out. anyways last week, me - 12-3-1, season - 104-82-5 (.559); fredo - 10-5-1, season - 101-85-5 (.543). yahootie, i'm smart! as always, point spreads from casear's/hilton, home team in bold. this is a tough week kiddos, so pay close attention.

CIN (+11) over NE
carson palmer is the prime example of what joey harrington is not. the first few years, while not steadily spectacular, will show flashes of brilliance, the same way david carr did early in the year. i think he's going to keep the good play going, to keep it within 10 pts.

CLE (+12) over BUF
i'm cheating here. fredo did some research and found out that teams coming off a loss to new england have been really good covering the spread. again, the bills win, but the browns will keep it close.

BAL (-10) over NYG
eli manning, say hello to ray lewis and ed reed. and at least two picks, one going for a td. eli's looking like he's going to be ok, but the giants are playing for next year.

GB (-9.5) over DET
sure the lions won last week, but i'm going to stick with never picking the lions again.

MIN (-6.5) over SEA
was that monday night game kick ass or what? seattle is retarded. i can't believe i put money on them during the preseason to win the superbowl. i blame it all on holmgren. seriously, hasn't this guy been given the longest leash for someone who only has one superbowl. i wonder how long he would've gotten if he were black. the only thing to worry about here is if this is the time of year where the vikes go into the annual end of season collapse. game one of this week's three team parlay.

ATL (-8) over OAK
kerry collins looks like he finally removed his head from his a-hole, but i think that last week's falcon loss was a blip on the radar on the way to a deep playoff run.

JAX (-7.5) over CHI
i am still seriously pissed off about the bears winning last week. but i think it says more about minnesota than it does about the bears. jags roll here in game 2 of my parlay and i'm going to bet 50 bucks against the bears again (6-7 on the big bet).

DAL (-7.5) over NO
maybe i'm overreacting about last week's win, but i think julius jones is looking to be a pretty brilliant draft pick by parcells. this looks like the game where the saints might play well, but it seems that they've completely given up on the season. i think it's a miracle that haslet hasn't been fired yet.

IND (-11.5) over HOU
it's tempting to take the home dogs here...just kidding. if you have edgerrin james on your fantasy team, you should expect two or three touchdowns as peyton is trying to save the record breaker for home.

NYJ (+6) over PIT
i'm just going to go ahead and always pick against the steelers here as i'm almost 99% sure that they'll lose one more game before the end of the season. the eagles and pats might finish 15-1, but not the steelers. the jets have a good good run defense too. don't think that big ben is the next great qb, he may be in the future, but remember kids, he's still a rookie. this is bet number 3 on the parlay. let's hope it works out for us.

MIA (+12) over DEN
can't pass up those points against the team that is qb'ed by jake the fake. was i right about him last week in the chargers game or what? anyways, denver keeps it on the ground much more towards the end of the year, so i suspect a relatively low scoring game.

CAR (-7) over STL
i'm starting to worry about my super bowl hangover theory. the panthers have looked awfully good the past few weeks. the rams have to fire martz at the end of this season. he's terrible.

ARI (-7) over SFO
no doubt this epic clash of titans will be the game shown in santa barabara this weekend. luckily i'll be in pasadena so i won't have to watch this abomination of a football game. this actually mirrors my fantasy football league, as this week, i have to win so i don't finish in dead last place. although, it's quite likely that i will lose.

TB (+5.5) over SD
i'm really not sure about this one. my theory here is similar to my steelers theory. the chargers aren't going to finish the season 13-3, so a loss is imminent at some point. although it breaks my heart to pick against them. especially since i'm hoping that drew brees will be the next dallas cowboys quarterback.

PHI (-9.5) over WAS
the skins are simply not good enough to put together two wins. philly looked awesome last week and they completely dismantled the packers. i think that they will go 15-1 this year, so i probably won't pick against them for the rest of the year unless the line is ridiculous.

KC (+1.5) over TEN
what do either of these teams have to play for? they should do something to liven games like this up at the end of the year, like replace the football with a medicine ball and not allow passing, or some tricked up crap like that.


more crazy news from aggieland.

even if you aren't interested in the texas a&M aggies, please read this, i promise that it will be worth it.


fun times at border's books

one paper down, one to go! i'll be so happy when this quarter is over so i can get a decent night's sleep. anyways, today i had some time to kill in between shifts at the computer lab today, so i went to border's with the intention of picking up some paperbacks for my upcoming christmas trip home. it's been a while since i've been to the bookstore, and overall, it was a pretty uneventful trip, but there are a few things worth noting.

1) pamela anderson has a new book out. a novel no less, called star. the description on the dust cover looked super goofy, but the really weird thing is that she co-wrote it with another real writer. now why don't we venture a guess as to how much of the book pammy wrote and how much the co-writer wrote...just goofy. anyways, at least the dust jacket has a good picture on the front.

2) there are about eight magazines with U2 on the cover. i picked up spin and for the first time in my life, i wasn't completely annoyed with everything in it. did anyone else know that dave eggers of AHWOSG fame is now a regular columnist for spin? as you can imagine, his column was full of generation x whining about nothing. if you couldn't guess, i'm not a fan of mr. eggers work. anyways, i have also come to the conclusion that as much as i hate chuck klosterman and that smug grin that he permanently has on his mug, i have to admit, he's a pretty good writer. he had two pieces in this issue, one on the concept of the perfectly rated bands, bands that are neither underrated or overrated. and the piece is genius. he also wrote the feature story about U2 and it was also pretty good. i actually saw him give a talk at a pop music conference in seattle once. his talk was completely stupid. his basic thesis is that we as music listeners tend to designate certain songs as socially important when maybe they were socially important only because they were really good songs. think about that...only "good" songs become socially significant...yeah...i know. anyways, he had that stupid grin on his face the whole time and he mentioned at least four times that he was a big kiss fan. in other words, he's your parigdigmatic ironic doofus hipster, but he's got a sweet gig. anyways, there's also a very interesting story about elliott smith's last days. this issue was so good, i'm actually contemplating getting a subscription.

3) another music writer that tends to get on my nerves is rob sheffield of rolling stone. however, like chuckie, he's written a pretty entertaining review of the new U2 album. even if you don't like U2, the first paragraph should make you chuckle.

4) this has nothiing to do with anything but i'm listeting to radio@netscape and it's playing an acoustic version of some avril lavigne song. good god this is horrible. how is this dumb canadian famous? i guess that chuck klosterman can cross this song off his socialy significant list of songs.

5) two other new books of note: there's a new godfather book. even though mario puzo died a long time ago, the publishing company probably ruined his legacy by having some writer that no one has ever heard of write a sequel. this despite the fact that there was already a movie sequel. also, there's a new michael crichton book. the dust jacket description sounded a lot like the plot to the da vinci code. i have to admit, i'm a michael crichton junkie. i realize that his books are dumb and mindless, but something about the way he writes just gets me juiced up, despite the fact i recently found out that he's a conservative douchebag. anyways, i'll probably wait for the paperback.

5) holy crap! the radio@netscape thing only lets me listen for three hours a day, unless i become an aol member. why in the world would i do that? anyways, i went fishing for other things to listen to and i just found out that the greatest radio station in these united states, WXRT in chicago, is finally being broadcast over the internet. this is the ultimate in ironic doofus hipster radio. praise be to god.



just a bunch of real interesting stuff from all over the net.

1) nike is in trouble for vandalizing bus stops in singapore. i suppose it's an innovative campaign, but it's such a dick thing to do. the super smart thing about this is that nike now gets free publicity because the singaporean (does anyone know the word to describe the people of singapore?) government is pissed off. if i were singapore, i'd fine the living crap out of nike or outlaw their products or something. i mean when that one kid spray painted those cars the singapore police beat the crap out of him with the cane. unfortunately since it's a corporation we're dealing with here, probably nothing is going to happen. and man that's so f-ed up. basically someone in the nike marketing department came up with this idea, probably fully aware that vandalism is illegal in most countries, and said, "screw your laws, we need to advertise." what if i decided to walk into nike headquarters in oregon and started spray painting my face all over their campus. would they be ok with the idea that i was just trying to establish my brand with nike employees? then they shouldn't be ok with them trying to establish their brand by being douchebags. i don't know why i'm so worked up about this, but it just seems real shitty.

2) from boingboing.net: apparently, someone is building a creation museum in kentucky. according to the website, the purpose of the museum is to
proclaim to the world that the Bible is the supreme authority in all matters of faith and practice and in every area it touches on. This ‘walk through history’ museum will be a wonderful alternative to the evolutionary natural history museums that are turning countless minds against the gospel of Christ and the authority of the Scripture.
fundamental christians can be so cute sometimes, like naive little kids who think that the tooth fairy and santa claus are real. anyways, if you're inclined, i highly recommend spending some time reading through their FAQ (particularly my favorite section on how they come to the conclusion that there were dinosaurs on noah's ark), and laugh condescendingly at the complete, willful, and disdainful ignorance of people who attempt to reconcile the bible with the fossil record, and their utter failure to do so. my four year old cousin could come up with a more coherent logic system then these people.

3) an interesting, but essentially dumb article on slate, about the college basketball exhibition circuit. you know, the non-college teams made up of NCAA players who couldn't get drafted, like the marathon oil team or the pella windows team. anyways, the article is about one of the teams that is sponsored by campus crusade for christ, and how the NCAA stopped letting D-I schools schedule these kinds of teams because of some kind of recruiting stuff. the article says that one of the reasons that these games really got killed was that the christian team was actually too good and was beating schools. well if you look at the team's schedule, you'll see that the didn't beat any legitimate college baksetball programs. the point i wanted to make in connection with the creation museum is that somehow evangelical christians always have the dumbest, most non-sensical logic systems. the general philosphy of these people is that christ has chosen for them, athletics as the way in which they can save other people. which in essense, is pretty much the same thing as kurt warner thanking jesus after he won the super bowl. hey kurt, if jesus loved you so much, why is your career in the toilet now? same thing with these athletes: if jesus wanted you to spread his word through basketball, he would have made you better so that you could reach more people through your NBA stardom. why didn't jesus choose michael jordan, the greatest basketball player on earth to spread his message. wouldn't that have made more sense? no, these things can't be taken into considertation, instead, you pretty much suck so now you use religion as some excuse as to why you're not a better player. somehow these a-holes conveniently ignore the short-sightedness and obtuseness of their logic system and just keep preachin'. anyways, the point is, it's a good thing that D-I schools no longer have to tolerate these a-holes (and yes, if you are trying to convert anyone, that makes you an a-hole...which pretty much makes all of christianity a-holes).

4) you have probably noticed that i haven't sounded off on the whole bonds and giambi on steroids thing. and i know this is sortuva copout, but i really just don't care. i've reconciled myself to the fact that several athletes use steroids. and while it does taint (heh heh) the sport somewhat, it's not the worst thing i think you can do. for me the hypocritical thing is that we as a sports mad society set these athletes up to win via illegal means. if we weren't so obsessed with winning at all costs, if we didn't agree to pay exhorbitant amounts of money for tickets, replica jerseys, and beer at games, and if we didn't deify our athletes so much, then maybe athletes wouldn't feel such pressure do things that hurt their body in order to succeed. maybe for them, the five or six years taken off at the end of their life wouldn't be worth the immediate success right now. cuz let's face it, in the big picture, ultimately the only people who are hurt are the ones who take steroids. and if they are willing up to give quality of life in the long term for immeidate payoff (sometimes in the form of multimillion dollar contracts), then that's their right to do. i suppose there's some stuff that i could comment on in terms of how it's being talked about (in the way i would about the ron artest deal), but i haven't had time to read much of the stuff...maybe later.

5) it's now more certain that pat tillman, the AZ cards linebacker who quit football to join the army died from friendly fire. i've already said my two cents about how i feel about the whole pat tillman deal (to find out, type in pat tillman in the handy dandy search box there on the right), but i do think that people who talked about "his noble sacrifice" ought to rethink their sentiments. what's so noble about a group of soldiers who can't get their shit together? so i guess it turns out that tillman didn't die protecting our country. instead he died because his fellow americans' itchy trigger fingers.


does anyone know where i can trade in two masters degrees for a PhD?

i'm literally minutes away from my MA defense, after which i will be the proud recipient of yet another meaningless masters degrees. you see with two masters, people will be twice as likely to not take me seriously. anyways, at least i can add people with only one masters degree to the list of people that i am better than. anyways, i guess i better get over to the conference room. thanks to all of my faithful blog readers, all 4 of you, for well...nothing, you really had nothing to do with me completing this...well, the blog was actually a good procrastination tool, so if you think about it, you actually have hindered me from completing my degree here. so thanks for nothing.

but seriously, everyone reading this better leave a congratulatory comment or i'm going to have to kick someone's ass.

bob ngo, MPA and MA.


too good not to tell you about

so here's a nice little story on CNNSI.com about kansas city chiefs tight end, tony gonzalez, and how when he was younger he used to get picked on by a couple of bullies and how he was able to overcome that to become the premier tight end in the league. anyways, i don't give a rat's ass about that. what i wanted to highlight was this great passage from the article.
Now Gonzalez is sharing his experiences in a book for children entitled Catch and Connect, which also details other parts of a life that's taken him from a tough neighborhood in Huntington Beach, Calif., to stardom in the NFL.
tough neighborhood in huntington beach huh? i'm sure it's as tough as those tough neighborhoods in winnetka, IL or sausalito, CA. i think it's great that he overcame the bullies, but come on, tough neighborhoods in huntington beach?

bobby the gook, week 13

i've been bogged down with end of the quarter crap, so i really haven'd had time to think about the games. i didn't do so bad with a stuffy head last week, so maybe, i'll just go willy nilly again and see if that helps any. this week, all gut picks, no thinking about home and away, no thinking about look ahead games or let downs, it's just whether or not i think the underdog is good enough to cover. anyways, last week: me - 8-8, season - 92-79-4 (.538), fredo 9-7, season 91-80-4 (.532). it's so close, so close now...anyways, point spreads from caesar's/hilton, home team in bold.

NYJ (-6.5) over HOU
f the texans. david carr is precariously close to taking the proverbial step backward this season. he has in my estimation the second best reciever in the NFL and the texans still can't move the ball in the air enough.

CIN (+7) over BAL
that ohio showdown game was something else huh? i wish i could have seen it. anyways, i think jamal lewis is out again, so that leaves the ravens with nothing on offense. carson palmer finally put up some decent numbers, but three INTs to go with those 4 TDs. i know, i know, the ravens' secondary is better than cleveland's, but scoring on defense is such a fluky thing. you should never count on defensive scores.

NE (-10) over CLE
ten points is alot, but the browns aren't playing the bengals' defense. this line is actually from ESPN. for some reason, the line is off right now on the vegas.com site, so there might be something up with an injury or something. so who knows.

ARI (+6) over DET
never picking the lions again.

IND (-11) over TEN
even with 11 points, can you pick against peyton? mcnair should retire. i have a feeling that in 20 years we're gonna see him on one of those news segments where the guy who played in the NFL basically can't walk.

MIN (-7.5) over CHI
i heard that chutch is starting at QB for the bears so that the organization can assess who's going to be the backup qb next year. bad times for bears fans. give me 50 bucks here (6-6 on the big bet).

BUF (-4) over MIA
mcgahee makes his homecoming, yadda yadda yadda, scores another three TDs. i really feel that miami should be getting more points here, so something may be amiss here.

ATL (+1.5) over TAM
this line confuses me as well. look ahead game? trap? oh yeah, no second guessing. the falcons are the superior team here. also, i've noticed that i've been using the wrong abbreviation for the buccaneers. fredo is correct, it is TAM, not TB

SFO (+11) over STL
the niners suck, but not 11 points more than the rams here. also, i've been using the wrong abbreviation for the niners as well, it's SFO, not SF.

CAR (+1.5) over NO
another weird line. especially with the way the panthers have played the past two weeks. myabe vegas is betting on the inconsistency of the saints. they've sucked pretty hard for the last two weeks so maybe vegas thinks that they'll be better this week. how the hell am i supposed to know. i'll go with the hot team here.

KC (PK) over OAK
the snow win for the raiders is just a toss up and not an issue of them turning some sort of corner. that was a tough loss for KC last week too. they played well enough last week to win most games. while the raiders still have their head up their collective asses. also, this is another ESPN point spread.

SD (-3) over DEN
can you believe that the broncos are playing for their playoff lives? i can, jake plummer sucks and he'll be the difference in this game as well, as brees will easily outplay him.

WAS (-2) over NYG
despite what all the pundits seem to think, eli manning is not that good yet, end of story. in fact, i'm wondering if he will even come close to bieng a legitimate winner in this league. he just doesn't seem to have those moments of brilliance that you would expect from a number 1 pick. the skins d will really shine today as the giants are banged up and bad, not a good combo.

PHI (-6.5) over GB
this was a tough one to pick, so i just went with the home team.

JAX (+3) over PIT
i refuse to believe that the steelers are good enough to not lose another game. this one seems like the right team at the right time.

DAL (+7) over SEA
f the seahawks. the tendency for seattle receivers to drop balls that land right in their hands will offset the problems that the cowboys have in their secondary. shaun alexander had a bad game last week, and while regular logic dictates that he'll bounce back, i can see tuna being able to gameplan well enough here to load up against the run effectively. while vinnie and julius are good for at least a couple of touchdowns. ok, so i went a little analytical on you here, but it's the cowboys, what'd you expect.


2 sports shorts + 1 tv take

how's that for a catchy title? anyways, a couple of things from the world of sports for you to think about.

1) robert lapchick, who is pretty much considered the dean on minority hiring in sports in academia, wrote a column for ESPN's Page 2 about ty willingham getting fired by notre dame. anything that i might have thought, he's pretty much crystallized pretty well here. something interesting about this whole ty willingham deal is that almost everyone (at least the major sports writers) all thinkn that ty got a raw deal here, but almost no one is saying that race might have had something to do with it. again, i'm not saying ty got fired cuz he's black, but it's certainly not out of the realm of possibility. an interesting bit at the end is lapchick comparing the advancement of african americans in sports to the advancement of women in sports. he says that women, even with the passage of title IX, really didn't get anywhere. it wasn't until people starting suing under title IX that high schools and universities started to shape up, although, they're still far from where they need to be. which leads us to....

2) an interesting report in slate by my favorite legal writer dahlia lithwick about a supreme court case where some dude got fired from his position as a coach at a high school for complaining about how the girls basketball team was getting the shaft (figuratively, not literally...i mean not figuratively....oh dammit, forget it) when the high school wouldn't let them practice in a new gym that the school had just built. all the legal stuff is interesting and you should read it, but what amazes me is that some school's administrators were such huge jerks that they wouldn't let the girls practice in a new gym? WTF? i couldn't imagine that during the planning stages of building the gym that anyone was saying, "you know, let's only build a gym for the boys team". how can you have enough education to be a school's principal and decide that girls aren't good enough to play in the new gym? do only the smart kids get to use new classrooms? i mean i'm from texas, and even there, most of the schools that i know rotated practices if there was a nice and a not nice gym. in texas!

3) f cbs and nbc. they've decided to not air ads from a church that features a gay couple joining this inclusive church. ridiculous quotes galore from the networks. according to the united church of christ, a CBS executive told them
Because this commercial touches on the exclusion of gay couples...and the fact that the executive branch has recently proposed a Constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is unacceptable for broadcast
CBS will not comment on whether or not someone at CBS actually said it, which probably means that someone did. nbc's quote was just as dumb. they're not quoted directly in the story, but according to the story
An NBC spokeswoman said the problem with the ad was not its depiction of same sex couples at church, but its implication that other religions are not open to all people.
ummm...newsflash, almost all religious denominations are not open to all people. when's the last time southern baptists let gay people in? i suppose i shouldn't be picking on southern baptists SINCE PRETTY MUCH ALL CHRISTIAN DEONOMINATIONS AREN'T OPEN TO GAY PEOPLE. anyways, the point is, cbs' and nbc's excuses are lame and ridiculous. what gets me is that the gay marriage referendum (if you believe that's what turned the election) didn't pass last november, so why are the networks so scared to just out and say, "we don't like gay people?" cuz deep down they, like most of the jerks who discriminate based on sexual orientation, know how immoral it is to hate on my cock-loving brothers and vagina-loving sisters, that's why.